Register free!

SC Cases - Judgement [ 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 ]  2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990 1989 1988 1987 1986 1985 1984 1983 1982 1981 1980 1979 1978 1977 1976 1975 1974 1973 1972 1971 1970 1969 1968 1967 1966 1965 1964 1963 1962 1961 1960 1959 1958 1957 1956 1955 1954 1953 1952 1951 1950 1949 1948 1947 1946 1945 1944 1943 1942 1941 1940 1939 1938 1937 1936 1935 1934 1933 1932 1931 1930 1929 1928 1927 1926 1925 1924 1923 1922 1921 1920 1919 1918 1917 1915 1914 1902 1900 1896 Select Court HC SC Others   First | Prev | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 | 60 | Next | Last Documents Found: 6595    Title Forum  Year Amit Suresh Bhatnagar vs ITO Directors liability: For companys arrears of tax-Condition precedent-AY 2001-02. Before proceeding against the director/s for arrears of tax of the company the department must establish that such director/s was responsi [LexDoc Id : 354585] HC (Gujarat) 2008 Raveendran K. and Anr. vs Excise Inspector Vadakara and Anr. [LexDoc Id : 353819] SC 2008 State of Punjab vs Avtar Singh [LexDoc Id : 353815] SC 2008 State of Punjab vs Gurdip Kaur [LexDoc Id : 353811] SC 2008 Gopal Balaji Prabhu vs Babuso Kusdo Naik and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 351748] HC (Bombay) 2008 Bengal Hammer Industries (P) Ltd. and Anr. vs CCE Manufacture-Whether shipbreaking amounts to manufacture-The SC held that since the issue of whether shipbreaking amounts to manufacture was not discussed properly, it befit a remand to the original authorit [LexDoc Id : 351251] SC 2008 Farhana Sait vs ACIT, TRO and ACIT Attachment of property-Powers of Tax Recovery Officer-The Tax Recovery Officer could not declare the oral gift as void. Schedule II to rule 11 of the Income Tax Act 1961 [LexDoc Id : 351050] HC (Chennai) 2008 Okhla Enclave Plot Holders Welfare Association vs UOI and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 348679] SC 2008 Lokesh Singh vs State of Uttar Pradesh and Anr. [LexDoc Id : 348677] SC 2008 Krishak Bharati Co-op. Ltd. vs JCIT Income derived from industrial undertaking-Service charges-AY 1993-94, AY 1994-95 and AY 1996-97. The assessee received service charges for supply of ammonia gas in addition to cost of ammonia gas. The iss [LexDoc Id : 348676] SC 2008 CIT vs Sarabhai Holdings (P) Ltd. Penalty: Wrong estimate of Advance Tax-Bona-fide belief-AY 1979-80 and AY 1980-81. The assessee had a bona fide belief that the interest income had not accrued and so filed "nil" estimate. No penalty for fi [LexDoc Id : 348503] SC 2008 Mahmadhusen Abdulrahim Kalota Shaikh vs UOI and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 348502] SC 2008 Guru Nanak Dev University vs Sanjay Kumar Katwal and Anr. [LexDoc Id : 348501] SC 2008 CIT vs Lotus Roofings (P) Ltd. Rate of depreciation-Rate for specific year in company-cases-AY 1991-1992. The restriction of 75% of the claim of depreciation in AY 1991-92 applied only to companies and for that AY alone. Proviso 3 to S.3 [LexDoc Id : 397710] HC (Chennai) 2008 CIT vs Kovilpatti Lakshmi Roller Flour Mills Ltd. Deduction on actual payment-Contribution to gratuity-The contribution to gratuity was made after close of previous year but before due date of filing return. The amount could not be disallowed. S.43 [LexDoc Id : 394111] HC (Chennai) 2008 J.R. Srinivas and Ors. vs Sri Gururaja Enterprises (P) Ltd. and Ors. Challenge to legality of claiming ownership in shares-Only legal heir entitled to challenge legality-The question of first petitioner, being entitled to challenge the legality of the claim for ownership put forth by the second and the fourth responden [LexDoc Id : 392254] HC (Karnataka) 2008 CIT vs Kattabomman Transport Corpn. Ltd. Business expenditure-Contribution to: Insurance fund for third party claims-The assessee was a transport corporation. It contributed towards insurance fund for third party claims as per Motor Vehicles Act, on the basis of numb [LexDoc Id : 392101] HC (Chennai) 2008 CIT vs Kovilpaiti Lakshmi Roller Flour Mills Ltd. [LexDoc Id : 389819] HC (Chennai) 2008 ADIT vs McKINSEY and Co. Inc [LexDoc Id : 376985] ITAT (Mumbai) 2008 T. Kodeeswaran vs ITO Penalty: Concealment of income-Applicability of explanation 5 to s.271(1)(c), Estimated addition-The addition to income was made on estimate. The addition made was not representing any valuables found during search. No penalty was leviable. LexDoc Id : 366028] ITAT (Chennai) 2008 Gujarat Fluorochemicals Ltd. vs DCIT Validity of re-assessment-Wrong head of income, No failure of assessee to disclose material facts-AY 2001-02. There was no failure of the assessee to disclose all material facts. The fact that the AO assessed certain income under a wrong head of in [LexDoc Id : 364117] HC (Gujarat) 2008 CIT and Anr. vs Ramakrishna Nursing Home Addition to income: Income of nursing home-Consultancy fee directly received by visiting doctors-The assessee was running a nursing home having visiting doctors on its panel. The fee collected by visiting doctors was not included in its income, si [LexDoc Id : 363020] HC (Karnataka) 2008 CIT vs Mani Kakar Validity of: Re-assessment-Non service of notice under s.148-AY 2001-02. The Tribunal quashed the re-assessment for the reason that no notice under s.148 was served on the assessee. S.292BB inserted w.e.f. 1 [LexDoc Id : 360433] HC (Delhi) 2008 U. Laxman Shenoy vs ACCT and Ors. Karnataka VAT-Reassessment of tax, Non-issuance of notice-The reassessment order passed by the Revenue department was set aside because the procedure contemplated under s.39 of the Karnataka Value Added Tax A [LexDoc Id : 360314] HC (Karnataka) 2008 Kanan Steels Ltd., In re [LexDoc Id : 359181] HC (Allahabad) 2008   First | Prev | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 | 60 | Next | Last